| |

Car Suspension System Diagram: Jounce, Rebound & Load Design

Have you ever wondered how an automotive suspension system is designed? From ATVs (all-terrain vehicles) to locomotives to modern passenger automobiles most types of vehicles that move people from one place to another rely on a suspension system to improve ride quality and comfort. There are a few common types of automotive suspension systems such as leaf springs, pneumatic systems, and hydraulic systems. Automobile suspension systems can also employ various types of springs such as leaf springs, helical coil springs, torsion springs (sway bar), and air springs. A typical coil spring system suspension comprises of many parts such as wheels and tires, springs, shock absorbers (damper), knuckles, and linkages.

Steering and front suspension system components diagram
Diagram of the steering and front suspension system components, including the control arms, tie rods, and knuckle.

The most common type of suspension system found in modern automobiles is a Macpherson Suspension which is an example of a helical coil springs with a hydraulic dampener. The spring absorbs shocks and stores energy, while the damper, also known as a shock absorber, dissipates this energy. The dampeners/ shocks are usually either hydraulic or pneumatic dampers, with a piston and a rod containing fluid utilized in car suspensions to slow down the motion of the spring. It’s worth noting that the front and rear suspension designs of a car may differ.

Is MacPherson strut suspension good?

Yes, MacPherson strut suspension is a good option for many vehicles. It is cost-effective and makes efficient use of space, which is ideal for compact car designs. MacPherson struts are durable, lasting a long time, and they are less likely to cause damage to other parts when they wear out, provided they are replaced promptly. To ensure optimal performance, it is recommended to check the struts every 50,000 miles to verify they are still functioning efficiently.

MacPherson strut suspension system diagram
This diagram shows a MacPherson strut suspension system, the most common front suspension design in modern passenger cars.

What is an Active Automotive Suspension System

Active suspension systems detect the forces acting on the wheels and continuously modify the mechanical links between the chassis and wheel assemblies. This adjustment aims to maintain the chassis level and efficiently absorb the energy linked to the vertical movement of the wheels.

Automated suspension system adjusting shock absorber stiffness
An active suspension system automatically adjusts shock absorber stiffness in real time to improve ride comfort and handling.

What is a trailing arm rear suspension?

A trailing arm rear suspension is a rugged and cost-effective suspension design commonly used in vehicles with front-wheel drive. It features two metal links, known as trailing arms, that connect the rear axle to the car’s body. These arms allow the rear axle to move up and down independently while ensuring proper vehicle alignment. Despite their simplicity, trailing arms play a crucial role in the suspension system, providing a good rear packaging design and contributing to the overall performance and stability of the vehicle.

Trailing arm rear suspension system diagram
This diagram illustrates a trailing arm rear suspension system, commonly used on the rear axle of front-wheel-drive vehicles.

Which forces act on an automotive suspension system?

The primary objective of a suspension system is to shield the vehicle’s passengers from disturbances originating from uneven road surfaces while ensuring consistent contact between the vehicle’s wheels and the road at all times. The suspension system requires special attention during tuning and calibration to maintain the optimal contact between the road wheel and the road surface since all the forces acting on the vehicle are transmitted through the tire contact patches. The forces acting on a vehicle’s suspension system can be categorized into road disturbances and load disturbances.

Automotive suspension system diagram showing key components
This labeled car suspension system diagram shows how the springs, shock absorbers, and control arms work together to connect the wheels to the vehicle body.

Road disturbances vary in magnitude and frequency, ranging from high-magnitude, low-frequency disturbances like off-road terrain to small-magnitude, high-frequency disturbances due to imperfections in paved roads. Load disturbances encompass forces resulting from changes in acceleration, braking, and cornering. An effective suspension system should respond smoothly to road disturbances and exhibit robustness against load disturbances.

Why is a suspension system necessary in cars?

A suspension system wears several hats, such as maximizing overall ride comfort for the vehicle. The suspension system must also maximize the contact between the car’s tires and the road. By maximizing the tire patch, the vehicle will be more stable and experience better handling. A suspension system is designed to meet the following strength and stiffness requirements:

  1. Strength requirements: braking, cornering, rollover, and vertical bump
  2. Stiffness requirements: vibration isolation and handling
Exploded diagram of an automotive chassis and suspension system
This exploded-view diagram shows how the suspension system components mount to the vehicle’s chassis.

Jounce vs. Rebound: What’s the Difference?

Jounce refers to the upward suspension travel and vertical movement that compresses the spring and shock absorber. A suspension will experience a jounce when a car comes in contact with a bump in the road. Rebound is the opposite of jounce and refers to the downward movement of the vehicle suspension. During rebound, the spring and shock absorber will extend.

Diagram defining suspension jounce and rebound travel
This diagram defines jounce and rebound, the upward and downward suspension travel relative to its resting ride height.

How is an automotive suspension system attached to a car?

For a coil spring style suspension, the front suspension will attach to the structure (body-in-white) at several points: the shock absorber, spring, and control arms. For a leaf springs style suspension system attach directly to the body-in-white (BIW). In this design, the shock absorber is attached to the clamp that holds the spring to the axle. The goal of the BIW/suspension interfaces is to locate and retain the front suspension in a way that allows the suspension system to function.

Diagram of suspension interface with the body-in-white structure
This diagram shows how the suspension system interfaces with the vehicle’s body-in-white (BIW) structure.

Allowable deformation: for all the driving scenarios such as braking, cornering, rollover, and vertical bump. The maximum allowable deformation of the frame/BIW is limited to what can be compensated for by a suspension realignment. Typically, this is about 1-2 mm of permanent deformation in the Body-in-white (BIW) to the suspension interface.

Automotive suspension system diagram
This automotive suspension system diagram illustrates the full assembly connecting the wheel to the vehicle frame.

Remembering that all the loads must be in equilibrium, the loads at body structure interfaces can be determined using a free-body diagram of the suspension after the loads at the tire patch have already been found.

What forces act on a resting car?

A car resting on a level road has two forces acting on it, the weight of the vehicle acting at its center of gravity (W) and the normal force or reaction force counteracting gravity at each of the tire patches (Rf and Rr).

Free body diagram of a vehicle at rest showing weight and reaction forces
This free-body diagram shows the static weight and reaction forces acting on a suspension system when the vehicle is at rest.

Since the vehicle is at rest, using the static equilibrium equation, the reaction forces at the front, and rear tire patch loads, RF and RR, can be written using the following equations:

Diagram of reaction forces at the front and rear tire contact patches
This diagram calculates the reaction forces at the front and rear tire contact patches, the starting point for suspension load calculations.

How does the Automotive Suspension System react to acceleration and braking?

If the vehicle is speeding up or braking the weight of the car will be temporarily altered. Thus varying the suspension positions accordingly. For example, while braking, the load on the front tires (Ff ) can be greater than on the rear tires (Fr). As a result, passengers experience the front dipping down (nose dive) when applying the brakes. The free body diagram can be generated for a steady-state braking deceleration of n times the acceleration due to gravity:

Free body diagram of a vehicle during braking
This free-body diagram shows the forces acting on a suspension system during braking, including weight transfer to the front axle.

Since the vehicle is assumed to be in equilibrium (steady state braking), it is possible to solve for the Fore-aft tire patch load, Ff.

Free body diagram for solving the fore-aft tire patch load during braking
This free-body diagram solves for the fore-aft tire patch load at the front suspension during braking.

It is then possible to deep dive into this system even further to review the forces that the suspension system is generating on the body structure as a result of braking. Since the fore-aft tire patch load, Ff, was found using a free-body diagram of the whole vehicle, it is possible to find Afa and Sfa. The result will show that predominantly the majority of the loads experienced BIW is transferred through the lower control arm ball joint Afa .

Free body diagram of the vehicle showing loads at the lower control arm ball joint
This diagram shows how braking loads transfer through the lower control arm ball joint of the front suspension system.
Diagram of suspension load equations for the lower control arm ball joint
This equation calculates the load at the lower control arm ball joint attachment point.

Where:

  • Ff = Fore-aft load at a front tire patch
  • n = Braking acceleration in g’s
  • μ = Coefficient of friction between tire and road
  • h = Height of the vehicle’s center of gravity above ground
  • Afa = Fore-aft lower control armload at the ball joint
  • Sfa = Fore-aft load at the strut attachment
  • r = radius of the tire
  • c = distance between the center of the wheel and the lower control arm
  • d = distance between the lower control arm to the upper body attachment

The reaction forces of the lower control arm ball joint load, Afa at the lower control arm attachment can be seen below.

Diagram of reaction forces at the lower control arm ball joint attachment
This diagram shows the reaction forces acting at the lower control arm attachment to the suspension structure.

What happens to the Automotive Suspension System while cornering?

When a vehicle is turning, a centrifugal force acts on the body and pushes it outwards (nW). However, this force is counteracted by the grip between the road and the tires (Li and Lo). As a result, the body rolls about its suspension. However since the suspension system also turns with the car, it is possible to feel the car dip or sway while turning. The free body diagram below can be generated for cornering loads at the tire patch without any load transfer.

Free body diagram of steady-state cornering with no load transfer
This free-body diagram shows steady-state cornering forces on a suspension system before any lateral load transfer occurs.

Based on the free-body diagram the lateral loads on the tires can be defined with the equations below:

Equations defining lateral tire loads during cornering
These equations define the lateral tire loads on the front suspension system during cornering.

Where:

  • Lo = Lateral Load on the outside front tire
  • W = Vehicle Weight
  • t = Track Width

What is a body roll in a car?

Body roll is defined as the way your car leans to one side during cornering. The higher the vehicle’s center of gravity, the greater the body roll. This is the reason why a pickup truck will experience much more body roll when compared to a small compact sedan. Race cars/sports cars are designed to minimize roll as much as possible since body roll can limit the speed at which one can travel around a corner. Severe under-steer, loss of overall tire grip, loss of mid-corner grip, and letting go suddenly, etc are very dangerous symptoms for a high-performance car. The free body diagram below can be generated for vehicle incipient rollover: outside corner front tire patch load:

Free body diagram of a vehicle experiencing body roll during cornering
This free-body diagram shows a vehicle experiencing body roll during cornering, which increases the lateral load on the outside suspension.

Lateral tire patch load, Lo, predominantly through lower control arm attachment, Al . The lower control arm attachment can be seen below.

Diagram of lateral tire patch load through the lower control arm attachment
This diagram calculates the lateral tire patch load transferred through the lower control arm attachment during cornering.
Diagram continuing the lateral load transfer calculation at the control arm
This diagram continues the lateral load transfer calculation at the control arm attachment for the front suspension system.

Loads at structure interface: Maximum lateral tire patch load during rollover mode

Where:

  • Lo = Lateral Load on the outside front tire
  • W = Vehicle Weight
  • t = Track Width
  • h = Height of the vehicle’s center of gravity above ground
  • AL = Lateral lower control armload at the body attachment
  • SL = Lateral Load at the strut attachment
  • r = radius of the tire
  • c = distance between the center of the wheel to the lower control arm
  • d = distance between the lower control arm to the upper body attachment

Dynamic load factors

  • A design load factor, r, is often applied to account for dynamic effects
  • Dynamic design load = rX (static maximum load)
Equation for dynamic design load as a multiple of static maximum load
This equation defines the dynamic design load as a multiple of the static maximum load, accounting for shock and impact events.

Can speed bumps damage an Automotive Suspension System?

Depending on the speed at which a speed bump or pothole is encountered while driving, the damage that can be done to the vehicle suspension can be significant. Striking a speed bump will force your suspension system into the jounce position, as it tries to absorb the excessive energy. Even if the suspension doesn’t bottom out, you are still placing extra wear and fatigue on the components of the suspension when you hit a speed bump. For example, if the load Rf is high enough, you could blow out a tire, break a coil spring, or a half shaft. The free body diagram below can be generated for vertical tire patch load while driving over a speed bump.

Free body diagram of vertical tire patch load over a speed bump
This free-body diagram calculates the vertical tire patch load on the suspension system when driving over a speed bump.

While driving over a speed bump the vertical load, Rf is predominantly counteracted through shock/springs Sv.

where:

  • Av= Vertical lower control armload at body attachment
  • Sv= Vertical load at the strut attachment
  • Rf= Vertical load at the tire patch

Benefits of a Double wishbone Automotive Suspension System

A double wishbone suspension offers several key benefits, including outstanding road holding and ride comfort, providing excellent stability and a smooth driving experience. It ensures excellent camber control, maintaining better tire contact with the road during turns, which improves handling and performance. The low roll center enhances vehicle stability by reducing body roll during cornering. Although the upper control arm consumes more space within the wheel well, it contributes to the overall effectiveness of the suspension system. Despite being more costly, the superior performance and comfort make the investment worthwhile for many drivers.

Double wishbone suspension system diagram
This diagram shows a double wishbone suspension system, a design that offers more precise wheel control than a MacPherson strut.

Double wishbone suspension Design

Loads at structure interfaces: for different suspension systems (short-and long-arm suspension)

Diagram of structure interface loads for short-and-long-arm suspension systems
This diagram shows the structure interface loads for a short-and-long-arm (SLA), or double wishbone, suspension system.


Loads at structure interfaces: for short-and long arm suspension: maximum vertical load at the spring-shock attachment during a bump

Diagram of maximum vertical load at the spring-shock attachment during a bump
This diagram calculates the maximum vertical load at the spring-shock attachment point during a bump event.
Diagram continuing the spring-shock attachment load calculation
This diagram continues the spring-shock attachment load calculation for the front suspension system.

Where:

  • Av= Vertical lower control armload at body attachment
  • Sv= Vertical load at the strut attachment
  • Rf= Vertical load at the tire patch
  • λ= Lever ratio for the spring/shock attachment to the lower control arm
Diagram of suspension interface structural requirements with lever ratio equation
This diagram defines the suspension interface structural requirements using the lever ratio equation.

Summary of forces act on a suspension system

Summary diagram of forces acting on a suspension system
This summary diagram consolidates all the forces acting on a front suspension system across braking, cornering, and bump load cases.
Summary table of front tire patch loads
This summary table compares the front tire patch loads calculated for each suspension load case.

Example of maximum loads on a front suspension system for a full-size truck.

To calculate the loads acting on the suspension system all the inertial vehicle parameters needed to be collected for the desired vehicle segment. All distance measurements are in meters, and all weights are in newtons.

 
1988 Chevy C101987 Ford F1501987 Dodge Ram
Wheelbase 2.9852.9592.78
Height 1.7731.792
Height of CG (h)0.6040.6690.77
Weight of Vehicle (W)181801688520088
CG to the front wheel (a)1.1691.1451.231
CG to rear wheel (b)1.8161.8141.549
Track Width (t)1.6181.6571.727
Coefficient of Friction (μ)0.70.70.7
Vertical Static Reaction Forces5530.135175.635596.46
Braking Acceleration (n)1.001.001.00
Steady State Braking (Front)10317.239918.1511729.80
Steady State Braking (Rear)14738.8914168.7916756.86
Cornering (Front)1445.431463.081747.02
Cornering (Rear)2064.902090.122495.74
Roll Over14814.1612819.1712552.06
Design Load per Tire (Lateral)7407.086409.586276.03
Design Load per Tire (For-Aft)7369.457084.408378.43
Design Load per Tire (Vertical)8295.207763.458394.69
Photo of a 1988 Chevrolet C10 pickup truck used for suspension load calculations
A 1988 Chevrolet C10 pickup truck, one of three vehicles used to compare front suspension loads in this example.
ModeLateralFor-aftVertical
Static (N) – –5530.13
Braking (N) –10317.2314738.89
Cornering (N)1445.43 –2064.90
Incipient Rollover (N)14814.16 –5530.13
Dynamic Load per tire (N)7407.087369.458295.20
Photo of a 1987 Ford F150 pickup truck used for suspension load calculations
A 1987 Ford F150 pickup truck, one of three vehicles used to compare front suspension loads in this example.
ModeLateralFor-aftVertical
Static (N) – –5175.63
Braking (N) –9918.1514168.79
Cornering (N)1463.08 –2090.12
Incipient Rollover (N)12819.17 –5175.63
Dynamic Load per tire (N)6409.587084.407763.45
Photo of a 1987 Dodge Ram pickup truck used for suspension load calculations
A 1987 Dodge Ram pickup truck, one of three vehicles used to compare front suspension loads in this example.
ModeLateralFor-aftVertical
Static (N) – –5596.46
Braking (N) –11729.8016756.86
Cornering (N)1747.02 –2495.74
Incipient Rollover (N)12552.06 –5596.46
Dynamic Load per tire (N)6276.038378.438394.69

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jounce and rebound?
Jounce is the upward suspension travel that compresses the spring and shock absorber, such as when a wheel hits a bump. Rebound is the opposite: the downward suspension travel as the wheel drops, such as into a pothole.

What’s the difference between jounce and rebound?
Jounce compresses the suspension (upward wheel travel relative to the body), while rebound extends it (downward wheel travel). Both are limited by bump stops and the shock absorber’s travel range.

What are the main parts of a car suspension system?
A typical coil-spring suspension system includes the spring, shock absorber (damper), control arms, ball joints, knuckle, and steering linkages, all connecting the wheel to the vehicle’s body-in-white structure.

What forces act on a suspension system?
A suspension system experiences vertical loads (from vehicle weight and bumps), fore-aft loads (from acceleration and braking), and lateral loads (from cornering), all of which are used to size the suspension’s structural attachment points.

Why is a suspension system important in a car?
The suspension system maximizes ride comfort by isolating passengers from road disturbances while keeping the tires in consistent contact with the road for grip, handling, and braking performance.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 6

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Similar Posts